Skip to main content
Staffordshire: The Rugeley Poisoner's First Victim
Foul Play: Crime Series — Series 38

Staffordshire: The Rugeley Poisoner's First Victim

February 10, 202622mEpisode 1

Show Notes

Season 38 examines one of Victorian England's most infamous murderers: William Palmer, the Rugeley Poisoner. This four-part series traces his crimes from gambling addiction to serial murder—and the groundbreaking forensic investigation that brought him to justice.

The Fatal Wager

November 1855. A man lies dying in Room 10 of the Talbot Arms inn. His back arches off the mattress. His jaw locks. Every muscle seizes at once.

John Parsons Cook had won big at the Shrewsbury races just days earlier. His horse Polestar crossed the finish line first, putting nearly a thousand pounds in his pocket. He should have been celebrating.

Instead, he's being murdered—slowly, methodically—by his own friend and physician.

Dr. William Palmer stands beside the bed, taking Cook's pulse. He doesn't call for help. He waits.

The Victim

John Parsons Cook was twenty-eight years old in 1855. Born into comfortable circumstances, he inherited enough money from his father to live without working. He trained for the law but never practiced—the racing circuit called to him instead.

Cook followed the horse racing meets across England: Shrewsbury, Wolverhampton, Chester. He owned horses. He wagered heavily. He lived for the thundering hooves and the roaring crowds.

But Cook suffered from chronic poor health. Stomach troubles plagued him. This made him dependent on physicians—a dependency that would prove fatal when his racing companion William Palmer decided he needed to die.

The Crime

William Palmer was a surgeon, a family man, and a serial killer.

By November 1855, Palmer owed more than twenty thousand pounds to moneylenders. His gambling addiction had consumed him. He had already murdered for money—his wife Anne (insurance payout: thirteen thousand pounds), his brother Walter (insurance claim pending), possibly his mother-in-law, and at least four of his own infant children.

When Cook won at Shrewsbury, Palmer saw an opportunity. The two men traveled together back to Palmer's hometown of Rugeley. Cook took his usual room at the Talbot Arms—directly across the street from Palmer's house.

Palmer began visiting Cook immediately, administering "treatments" for his illness. Each time Cook improved, another dose sent him back to agony.

Cook suspected. He told friends: "I believe that damn Palmer has been dosing me." But suspicion wasn't proof, and Palmer was a doctor. Doctors could be trusted.

The Investigation

What followed Cook's death would transform British forensic science and create new legal precedent.

Dr. Alfred Swaine Taylor, England's foremost toxicologist, examined Cook's remains. He found no strychnine in the body—the poison metabolized too quickly. But the symptoms were unmistakable: tetanic convulsions, locked jaw, arched back.

Taylor's testimony established a critical principle: absence of poison does not equal absence of poisoning. Clinical symptoms and circumstantial evidence could establish murder even when the weapon couldn't be found.

Palmer's trial became so notorious that Parliament passed special legislation—the Central Criminal Court Act 1856, forever known as "Palmer's Act"—to move the case from Staffordshire to London's Old Bailey.

Thirty-two medical experts testified. The jury deliberated eighty-two minutes.

Verdict: Guilty.

Historical Context

The Palmer case exposed the vulnerability of Victorian society to medical murderers. Physicians held almost unquestioned authority. Patients trusted them with their lives—literally.

Palmer exploited this trust systematically. His medical knowledge allowed him to choose poisons that were difficult to detect, calculate doses that would kill without immediate suspicion, and explain away symptoms as natural illness.

The case accelerated the development of forensic toxicology across Europe. Scientists raced to develop more sensitive tests for alkaloid poisons like strychnine.

Sources consulted: Old Bailey Online trial transcripts (May 1856); The Times contemporary coverage; British Newspaper Archive; Oxford Dictionary of National Biography; forensic toxicology historical analysis.

Resources

Primary Sources:

  • Old Bailey Online: Trial of William Palmer (May 1856) — oldbaileyonline.org
  • British Newspaper Archive coverage of Rugeley poisoner case

Further Reading:

  • Katherine Watson, "Poisoned Lives: English Poisoners and Their Victims" (2004)
  • Robert Graves, "They Hanged My Saintly Billy" (1957) — literary treatment

Crisis Resources:

  • For concerns about elder financial abuse or medical exploitation: Adult Protective Services


Support the Show

If Foul Play brings you into history's darkest corners, consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Reviews help new listeners discover the show—and every share helps us continue telling these stories.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out BetterHelp: https://www.betterhelp.com


Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/foul-play-crime-series/donations

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Share:X / TwitterFacebook

Credits

Shane WatersFounder & Host

Wendy CeeCo-Host

Produced by Myths & Malice

Listen to Foul Play: Crime Series